Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenswing
No, you’re not thinking. After all of the data that Sarah has provided you still refuse to accept the fact that pistols kill far more people than rifles and are the mass murderers weapon of choice. Now you’ll probably go off on some tangent about snipers. Don’t bother.
|
Here is what a thinking (intelligent) mass murderer asks himself, ( "do I want to be running around at ground level pointing and hitting people with a LOW ENERGY pistol bullet - while I expose myself to possible death from my potential targets, some of which have concealed carry permits and my targets know where I am located and can run in the opposite direction. Plus I have to run with them so I would not be accurate except when I stop running and I expose myself to shots or being hit by thrown objects"
"or do I pick an elevated position at least 70 yards of DISTANCE away from the intended targets - that has good cover like a ledge and use a high-powered RIFLE (even one with a bump stop) and maybe a front bipod and a scope for greater accuracy - and the bullet from the high powered RIFLE will hit the intended targets with a greater velocity and energy (than a PISTOL !!!!!!!!) - plus the elevated position and DISTANCE will change the SOUND of the shot, causing some of the targets (victims) to run in different directions (some to me) - thus ensuring greater success in my demented plan to eliminate the greatest number of human beings - and thus ensure that my friends on the dark web will herald me as the greatest mass murderer of my time !!!!!!!"