Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive
Precisely the point of the post. Lazy person's "logic". MUCH easier to kill the messenger than to try to refute the message.
The precise same "approach" is used when someone disses CNN or MSNBC as "not reliable".
In neither case is the MESSAGE being considered.
|
By that logic I'm too lazy to refute flat-earthers and psychics too. I can live with that.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|