Quote:
Originally Posted by George Page
I agree, my post is a “collection of common sense statements.” Thank you.
Yours, on the other hand, is a collection of poor, out of scale, illogical analogies.
Unless you are drastically misinformed, you know there is science supporting both sides of the climate change debate. Unlike you, I recognize both sides. However, I believe there is time to thoughtfully address the problem without negatively impacting the quality of life on the planet. Doomsday in less than 12 years?
I think not,
|
Okay, I will ignore the attacks and insults which seem to dominate your side of the argument.
You consider the opinion of 20% (maximum, many say less) of trained scientists more valid than the opinion of 80% to 90%.
I assume you base your choice of logical evidence on the vast background you have in climatology and a degree you got in that field - at which university was that? I missed it.
In other words, your definition of logical is to accept the advice of the minority and ignore the advice of the majority.
Please educate us on how that works.