[Byte1]

From what I have heard, read and experienced, scientists have often been wrong. Their theories have been lucrative toward their future employment. It's great that they have records of temperature, rainfall and tide change history, but have they ever really been able to find a correlation between those factors and man contributed climate change? Nope, only theory. It's easy to record history, but very difficult to predict accurately the future. I believe methane has been in existence on Earth long before mankind, and without CO2 can we have plant growth? Without plant growth can we have oxygen? Kind of like arguing ecology, right? Man is at the top of the ecological food chain, or am I mistaken? However, without man the world will still survive, right? But, what's the point? Without man, the world will still have Climate Change. You might say that Climate Change is just part of Evolution.