Quote:
|
Originally Posted by YeOldeCurmudgeon;2144957[B
]But not even close to how quickly the increasing temps have occurred since the advent of the Industrial Revolution.[/B] This is the key factor that your point fails to address. This has also been referenced by other posters, some of whom have made very compelling arguments and you should read them.
|
Scientists or stats suggest that temps increased since the "advent of the Industrial Revolution?" Can they prove that the industrial revolution caused the increasing in temps or can they just prove that the temps happen to rise and that there was an industrial revolution? I light a candle at 6am in the morning. At 7am the same morning the sun comes up and the temp rises. Did the candle make the temp warmer or did the natural rotation toward the sun make the temp rise?
Like I have said before, scientists make mistakes and then they flip and cover up their mistakes with scientific explanations. Not all scientists, but it does happen. Once an expert comes up with a theory, then many others jump on the band wagon. Just because many "experts" concur with one, does not make him/her right. Motivations make a difference also, as someone else said in an earlier post.
I don't support the Green New Deal. I have no intention of supporting the bankruptcy of our country, just to bankroll a fantasy. The only way man is going to control climate change is to build a huge dome over their environment where they can control the climate inside. Our world will change whether mankind is here or not. I agree that man can contribute to pollution and that can be remedied to a certain extent by lowering pollutants. I do not agree with some nuts idea of lowering the population of cattle to bring down the methane gas from flatulence.
Scientists have proven to us that plants thrive in CO2 and produce oxygen. Thank goodness we can't eliminate CO2.