Quote:
Originally Posted by tvbound
LOL
Instead of spending the time to refute almost every single one of your sentences, which fit one of the below categories, I'll just repeat from my earlier post - that you have so aptly shown to be correct.
"...who refuse to believe/try to manipulate/purposely obfuscate the science..."
My favorite part though, is the astounding hubris exhibited in your statement..."call those of us with a knowledge of paleoclimatology and some common sense "selfish"."
I certainly don't claim to always be correct, but I am always on guard for those who are loquacious (as if quantity somehow equates to proof/correctness), have the need to be the smartest in the room and anything said in disagreement - must be instantly discounted. Have a great day.
|
Amazing---I'm sorry but i can hardly type because I'm laughing so hard.
Hubris????? Do you deny calling people who Joyce Whatsherface calls "Di-NYE-AHS" selfish????
Because here is your post:
From a very broad view, there are really two primary trains of thoughts on anthropogenic (human caused/contributed) climate change/warming.
1. Those who refuse to believe/try to manipulate/purposely obfuscate the science embraced by 90%+ of the world's legitimate scientists who are most educated on the subject, so that they are not inconvenienced in their current quality of life and bristle - at making any current sacrifice(s) for the future.
2. Those who actually care about the sustainability of the planet for their children/grandchildren/great-grandchildren/Etc. and are willing to take action and make sacrifices NOW, to 'TRY' and reverse/slow down the adverse effects to our planet already occurring.
Since I can't even imagine being that
selfish...count me being in the latter group.
PS: I'm still laughing
