Quote:
Originally Posted by midiwiz
this is the only focus???? you leave out the fire dept that costs each household more. the "owner" has billions, it should be part of the provided amenities and paid for by them It's a write off anyway for them but apparently they aren't well versed in this.
|
You're kidding, right? At least I hope so. If not, why on God's green Earth should the "developer" pay for YOU to have protection on YOUR home against fire???? Because he has "billions"????? Another Robin Hood philosophy????
I'm sure most of us have more assets than a homeless drug addict-----let's give it away to them. Oh wait, we do---it's called charity and it is VOLUNTARY. So why not make it REQUIRED like you propose for "the developer"? A little different when the shoe is on the other foot?