Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580
20,000 years away? Just may be sooner than that, IF some of us don't quit shouting that science is a conspiracy to steal our money.
150 years of climate data? The data is in core samples of earth and ice. It is in the rocks and evidence is there. That is how we know what the earth climate was in past ages. But you deny or forgot millions of years of earth history and the sciences that solve the mysteries of the past. Instead you brand all those scientists as idiots, liars and conspirators in a money grab scam?
And the little gravestone? That is an insult to all the men and women who ever did research to try and find cures for human illnesses or answers to scientific questions.
|
Are you suggesting that scientists would volunteer to do these studies if they were not getting paid? And do you think that they would stretch out this research if they were not getting paid? Do you believe ALL scientists and their results? You said you believe the information that scientists have provided about the climate changes in the "millions of years" of history, but when someone says that most of that time, humans weren't around, and there was climate change you still feel that mankind has caused climate change? Why is it that so many folks seem to think that man caused pollution is synonymous with man caused climate change?
I guess you can say that I changed the climate from cold winters by moving South to Florida where the winters are warm. That changed the climate for me. But, even though some on here argue that man is responsible for climate change, they have yet to prove that man has contributed to changing the climate. Just stating absolutely that man really has changed the changes or weather cycles, does not prove it. Yes, I believe that scientists that get paid to do research into a subject with the goal of proving a preconceived outcome, are wasting (stealing) taxpayer money, if they are not being honest/honorable about the results. An arson investigator can prove that a man caused a fire, therefore fire was caused by man. However, there can be a forest fire that was caused by lightning also. That investigator cannot say that all fires are caused by man. He cannot say that since man CAN cause fire, a forest fire was caused by man. Not a very good example, but you cannot say that man exists therefore man caused climate change.