Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitley
I consider the EU having to go to court to get pfizer to release studies and Agreements something less than transparency. Even then 90%+ of each page was blacked out (see EU press conference below). It was because of these hearings that we ever found out the vaccine was NOT tested to see if it prevented transmission prior to being distributed. I guess we have a different definition of transparency.
FDA having to be ordered by a judge to release documents pertaining to their approval of the vaccine (FDA said it would take 75 years, miraculously accomplishes it in 8 months. See below)
And I would like to see a peer review study as well as any statistics showing stat significance in the results to back up what is claimed. Perhaps we have a different definition of science as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnSnQor8zDY&t=615s
FDA says it needs 75 years to release Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine data to the public - Euro Weekly News |
I’m pretty sure I knew it was not tested to prevent transmission when I read the study results at about the time the vaccines were first released.
Not different definitions, just different expectations and different understanding of reality and of what is possible.
I will continue to view the murky ratios as good enough for me.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
Last edited by Bill14564; 10-26-2022 at 11:03 AM.
|