Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
First of all, keep your personal insults to yourself, the moderators tend to frown on that.
So, once again, I'll try to educate the indoctrinated:
The premise seems to be "the last 150 years is the problem" because there is a slight warming trend.
What about the 150 year period from 34,850 t0 34,700 BC? From 345,250 to 345,100 BC? From 2,657,550 to 2,657,400 BC???????
Oh, no data???? Yet no problem drawing a "conclusion" about the last 150 years???? 
And they draw that conclusion since that is when man started burning fossil fuels.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc---which translates as "after this, therefore because of this". It is the battle cry of those who embrace faulty cause and effect "reasoning"
But I certainly agree with one thing----"a fool will never admit his foolishness" |
??? You complain about insult, then immediately insult everyone who accepts mainstream science and the finest minds and latest findings by calling us "the indoctrinated". Now that is an insult.
Climatologists have the data you claim doesn't exist. It is written in the earth itself. In the rocks, the fossils.
And, "cause and effect" is not always faulty. You use it every time you play golf. We all do.
So, believe what you wish, and be content with the probability that the ocean will not drown us in our beds. And, let those of us who accept the finding of those scientists actually working in the field of climatology believe what we do.