
11-06-2022, 07:22 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South of 466a, if you don't like me.......I live in Orlando.
Posts: 12,833
Thanks: 1,011
Thanked 11,031 Times in 4,213 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuccillo
I am pretty sure I know a lot more about the science than you since I am a retired research meteorologist. There is considerable short term variation in temperature data. If you are interested in anthropogenic changes then you need to consider long time periods and also compute running means. The original dataset has over 40 years of data from passive radiometers and shows a clear warming trend in the troposphere. Cherry picking a small subset (about 1/6 of the data) from the original dataset is not sound, particularly when you pick a high point as your starting point in an attempt to try to disprove an idea supported by a large amount of peer reviewed, sound research. Sounds like you are another person who doesn’t know what a logarithm is.
|
Or, you could have said:
I pretty sure you can't fix stupid.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful
|