Quote:
Originally Posted by barb1191
Gee thanks so much VK, I think.
I sure hope that you really don't think that all can digest all of that explanation, however, it is very impressive and if one can break it down, it sure helps clarify the erroneous insuation made. We do appreciate your time and effort in clarifying the situation. Yes, very impressive. .
|
K, I guess I'm one of those "all" that barb1191 says struggled to "digest the explanation" you offered. However, I do understand polysyllabic expression and learned how to research in college when Hector was a pup..... although I concede that Google has made things a lot easier. Curiously, I didn't see any attribution in your post so I assumed it was original thought.
I was surprised to see that a good part of the post was "lifted" verbatim out of the Federal Reserves own site. Using that as the reference seems a little like asking O.J. Simpson to head the investigation into his wife's murder.
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...&ct=clnk&gl=us
I know you tempered the Federal Reserve article with your own knowledge and experience. I have always respected your professional expertise and seldom disagreed with you on matters of finance or economics. I've had fun and great cerebral exercise with you on our somewhat different political perspectives. I'm just not a big fan of cut and paste especially without attribution. Perhaps it was an oversight.
I believe all the members of this forum are educated, enlightened and fully capable of "digesting" what they read regardless of the source.
Have a great day in the Villages.