Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Interestingly, those statements are both right and wrong at the same time.
Yes, there are plenty of studies linking cancer to second-hand smoke---and while many are just agenda driven, there are many legitimate studies as well
However, the "logic" of smoking causes cancer therefore second-hand smoke must as well is deeply flawed. There are significant differences between what the smoker inhales and what he exhales-----just as there are significant differences between what we eat and what----well, you know the rest  |
Narratives are fine, but a data-driven study is what works in the field of science. You can assume and believe anything you wish, but there is no data to support your claims -- just like man-made global warming.