[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Interestingly, those statements are both right and wrong at the same time.

Yes, there are plenty of studies linking cancer to second-hand smoke---and while many are just agenda driven, there are many legitimate studies as well

However, the "logic" of smoking causes cancer therefore second-hand smoke must as well is deeply flawed. There are significant differences between what the smoker inhales and what he exhales-----just as there are significant differences between what we eat and what----well, you know the rest

I read this to mean that intuitive logic can be correct often.