Quote:
Originally Posted by asianthree
So you agree a person from piedmont should travel by cart to fernandina to drive through that neighborhood filling out a complaint (usually a 100) that they deemed a infraction.
They don’t live even close to that neighborhood, but since they fished out their own neighborhood, and all close by, they travel on, to different CDD’s.
I get neighbors a block over walking or driving past a house who has a plant that looks like it may or not be a cross that is offensive to the walker to write a complaint.
I just don’t get why one would travel miles to an area they would never frequent, to write hundreds of complaints? Is it a get even for an infraction that was leveled on their home? Or just a compulsive disorder to have upheaval wherever they deemed offensive, true or not.
Out of the 80 plus complaint written in our old neighborhood, only 11 were against deed restrictions.
So think of the amount of time to read hundreds of what May or not be a issue, individually respond to the complaints, then require them to waste resources such as gas to find out it’s a non issue. All because someone who lives 10 miles away is choosing this is “Their life long dream in Retirement to do unto to others that was probably done to them.
Because they chose that your home needs to be in line with their views. In their mind they are the “Chosen One”. Not a governing employee, a person who lives miles from you.
Where does one think the money and resources come from to pay for this? In our case it was a vine that had curled around to look like a cross, if you turned sideways and looked upside down. And NO, there would never be a cross in my yard.
Let those who live near keep their streets in compliance, travelers need not bother
|
What is important here? The infraction, or the person/people/agency reporting the infraction? Again. NOBODY is issued a correction order based solely on the word of a reporter. It is checked out, and if not in compliance, the order is issued.
What does matter though is this neighbor-against-neighbor thing. Having Community Watch be responsible for monitoring and reporting infractions eliminates that type of infighting, which does nobody any good. The powers-that-be made the rules. The powers-that-be MUST be responsible for monitoring for rule infraction and then enforcing the rules. This cowardly way out that apparently those powers have chosen, especially with the cockamamie decision to make the names of the reporter(s) public, inevitably leads to bitter neighborhood feuds and completely arbitrary and random enforcement. And who really needs that?