Quote:
Originally Posted by cabo35
Bucco....it does not surprise me that your insightful post would receive an ad hominem attack from the far left. Those who cannot defend the indefensible and the facts that define the truth....attack the messenger. Classic Alinskyesque tactic right out of the Rules for Radicals. To them the truth is "venom". Perhaps someone from the left would like to argue the points in your post instead of attacking the man. Now that would be a fun debate and great mental exercise. Thanks for the courage to post emerging truths.
|
I am not far left, as you put it. My point is, that is seems ok for people on here to attack Obama, or whoever for what they say and do. But, when someone wants to say something about THEM, by what we see in their posts, then it is an attack. What is the difference? Again, it's a double standard. Also, unless you are in the inner circle, I don't care how much you read, you are still at the will of the press as to what you ACTUALLY know. For people to post on here, and say they know this or that, are tunnel-visioned. If you have thin skin, and can't take when someone disagrees with your post, or sees something in your post that gives them an opinion of you, that's too bad. How do you think YOU get an opinion of a president? By the same way, hearing reports, reading articles, etc etc. So, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander. Don't expect everyone to agree with the way you think.