Quote:
Originally Posted by mtdjed
I don't know any of the facts. Was she drinking, on drugs? Multiple offenses? Sound state of mind? Just seems like a possible huge burden on the state.
Granny doesn't need to pay for housing, car expense, property tax , income tax, insurance, food, medical expenses, utilities anymore and still get her pension, social security and IRA income. Do you think you could keep her a bit longer so our inheritance can build up a little more?
|
The poster above was obviously misguided in his statement. Oh, that was me.
I took the time go back and read about the incident and the subsequent facts.
Seems like they already reduced the time and that "the inheritance " is also subject to loss due to the incident.
An obvious, crime of hit and run, should be punished regardless of age.