Originally Posted by Keedy

I agree. It is a sad state of affairs when someone doesn't participate after their candidate "won". A person of conviction will have an opinion one way or another and try to reason said opinion to his fellow constituents.
There is a an old movie called "12 angry Men." Basically the synopsis is---a jury who thought it was going to be an easy guilty verdict. One guy was a "holdout" and that made the other jurors angry as they wanted to go home because they thought the accused was guilty. The lone juror received the scorn of the others until they dissected the evidence more closely and one by one the jurors finally went to the other side and joined the lone juror who thought the defendant might be innocent.

I would love to see some people with "guts" defend their candidate instead of hiding behind ridicule.