[oldtimes]

Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy

Do you really think that you are the only one who wants to know? Don't you think that every epidemiologist and every research hospital wants that data to better understand efficacy? Did you read post # 77
https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...64-post77.html
about the difficulty of the electronic medical records system setup and reporting from the beginning of the pandemic? do you understand who is in charge of reporting public health reporting? So if you want to do your part, you take all the survey serious and answer as accurately possible. Data collection is costly in time and cleanliness, but the more data collected, even if its noisy, the better. . .

I have posts from within a research and educational hospital system from coachK (my wife) on here who was in the middle between EMR internal systems and public health system reporting requests, as well as publishing hourly updates to internal reporting sites for virus status to the medical staff. the statistical mis representations of the data happens very quickly, simpson's paradox, with a real life data example in one post. . . .

go do some searches on our name, and the virus/data/etc, and you will learn where data lives, and how its reported, and that public news sources do NOT publish all the data for privacy and other reasons, and its not black and white at all, its not a death no death outcome analysis, and its not solely a vax / no vax status, there are many confounding variables to normalize, to find the most accurate possible answer, but it will never be perfect as there is NEVER complete and accurate and clean data, that only exists in entry level data analysis courses.

Exactly! So all of the studies that everyone is quoting as doctrine are in fact flawed.