Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
There is no debate about global warming. The Earth has been warming for the last 23,000 years, as it has done 44 previous times in the last 4 1/2 million years. The debate is whether or not human activity has anything to do with it. Given the time frame, and considering we have only burned fossil fuels for the last 200 years, the obvious conclusion is NO. My question is (will be), when the Earth cools again, as it has done 44 times prior in the same 4 1/2 million years, will that also be the fault of human activity?
In addition, there need not be any "conspiracy" to hide the truth that anthropomorphic climate change is a myth. People and organizations will simply say and do what is in their own self-interest, which in this case is to go along with the current political climate agenda, even though they know it is a lie.
|
There have been clouds in the skies since the earth began. The debate is whether or not human activity has anything to do with it. Given the time frame and considering we have only burned fossil fuels for the last 200 year, the obvious conclusion is the human activity
DOES NOT contribute to the smog in California.
The debate is not whether the earth is warming (well, except for sounding who only accepts it occasionally and even then argues that it is cooling), the debate is whether human activities are accelerating the warming. "
the truth that anthropomorphic climate change is a myth" is an opinion shared by some and not a fact. The fact is that some large percentage of published science shows human activity *DOES* contribute to warming. Another fact is climate change deniers have concocted some elaborate conspiracy theories to dismiss the published science rather than producing papers that dispute it.