Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123
Respectfully, I usually agree with your posts, but not in this case. What SECO is doing is theft. Plain and simple. It is not the same thing as companies warning customers of a future rate increase. We both know that suing SECO is not practical. Customers should not be required to do anything to prevent SECO from taking their money.
|
To me, theft happens without knowledge, without warning, without recourse, and without benefit to the victims. None of those are true in this case. The program was announced well ahead of time, there was a way to opt-out then, there is a way to opt-out now, and there is a tax benefit to making the donation (yes, a tiny benefit, but proportional to the very small amount being donated).
Yes, we usually do agree but apparently not this time.... and that's okay.