Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive
That was not Minnesota, but Michigan. Minnesota is ruled by a retired Master Sergeant/History teacher with delusions of adequacy.
Somewhat dangerous ground however, attempting to compare intelligence levels with gun ownership. Any correlation one could make would be completely subjective; and could possibly be seen as an attempt by the person making such a correlation to justify a certain mindset about guns and gun ownership when all other attempts at making a logical argument one way or the other have failed.
|
I have NO problem with gun ownership. I have crawled through cactus needles out west to HUNT Pronghorn Antelope with BOTH a rifle AND a bow. And I "fair chased" the antelope - meaning that I did not sit and WAIT for them to come to a WATERING hole like some sad assassin. So, I earned MY respect on the subject of guns and hunting.
.........I thought I made myself clear that all gun owners are NOT lowlifes, but those creeps with masks and bulletproof vests strutting like roosters with their 30 round magazine semi-autos in other words, NOT a weapon for hunting or DEFENSE (NOT offense) for a home. It is those strutting ROOSTERS with equivalent brains that we see on TV in Arizona, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and others...........that I find sickening and offensive to my 1950s image of the NRA as a hunting magazine. Just brain-dead soldiers of fortune-want-to-be-s.
.........No, there is legitimate gun ownership and YES, that is my interpretation of the situation. And I know that others may think that those POSERS are wonderful, but I think they just give GUNS and America a BAD name and image to the WORLD.