Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker
Where I grew up, leaders accomplished a lot of great things to make life better for everyone. Residents appreciated improvements, especially ones that were hard to do. There were a few "don't change my life" people, but once they saw firsthand, many became idea generators who created new suggestions. I had no reason to think that level of critical thought cannot happen here too.
Just because something may be hard to do, or "that's the way we always have done it", doesn't automatically mean it should not change. Obstructing change for those reasons is foolish. Look at history. Cars replaced horses. Fuel injection replaced carburetors. Computers replaced slide rules. LED bulbs replaced tungsten filament bulbs. Things evolve. People can choose to help, or obstruct. My choice is clear.
|
Total obfuscation and irrelevant argument to the question in hand.
The wild animal kingdom is finding it harder and harder to survive under us humans, as we diminish their habitats.
Extermination of species because they
may be a problem is not the way to go.
Removing predator species of any description, increases the prey species to plague numbers.
Given your argument and solution, all that will survive are roaches and rats!