Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive
For the umpteenth time, whether or not the person who was shot had a gun at the time he was shot means NOTHING. All that matters is that the person who shot him had REASONABLE CAUSE to believe that he had a gun and was going to use it to injure or kill people. And everything that happened up to the time the guy was shot, certainly points to that.
People who comment on the law might try to understand it first.
|
Did the guy who shot him see the man shoot a gun outside?
That might be the only reasonable argument that may stand up.
You just can't shoot every person who reaches into there pants.
Also the law doesn't say reasonable it says imminent danger.
Was the guy in imminent danger?
Just release the video so us TOTV lawyers can decide.