Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtimes
This is the first one I looked at in District 10. I saw the same in every one I checked.
2.24 The Subdivision is an adult community designed to provide housing for persons 55 years
of age or older. All Homes that are occupied must be occupied by at least one person who is at least fifty-five (55)
years of age.
2.10 Properties within the Subdivision are intended for residential use and no commercial,
professional or similar activity requiring either maintaining an inventory, equipment or customer/client visits may
be conducted in a Home or on a Homesite.
|
For 2.10, a renter is not inventory or equipment and renting is not likely to be considered a customer/client visit to the business in the sense that it is used in this section. I posted something similar in #15.
2.24 is much longer than those two sentences. Other sentences in that section mention "occupied," "permanent resident," and "80% of the Homesites." If you can make the argument that this section applies to visitors or that AB&Bs are only rented by those under 55 or that there are more than 14,000 AB&Bs (20% of 70,000 homes) rented by someone under 55 at any one time then perhaps that would trigger a violation of this section.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|