I don't believe the CDDs would want that. It could open them up to complaints about selective enforcement. An example would be if someone is cited for an actual deed restriction violation and they point out that another home has had the same deed restriction violation for some time. Essentially, they would need to catch every violation. I have seen this problem in a previous community. With the existing system, they only have to investigate the anonymous reports. I am not sure why residents get so upset about this. If you are reported and there is actually no deed restriction violation then you may very well not even know about the report. If you are in violation then you should correct it. If anyone should be upset it should be Community Standards that has to go out and investigate the reports of alleged deed restriction violations. It sounds like there might be non valid reports of deed restriction violations by some serial reporters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asianthree
Have never been upset about deed restrictions, it’s the waste of man/women hours to have 50%plus not even be a deed issue.
Why because someone is angry, and the get even with as many as possible is the agenda. We pay for community service to drive thousands of miles every day, why not have a standard group. At least their filing would be correct
|