Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomer
“Healthcare at Risk”? This hate-based horror, including misogyny, goes well beyond the potential for risk.
So life and death decisions can now be based on nothing more than the subjectivity of anyone working at any level of healthcare?
This looks to me like it grants a “License to Kill.”
Hmmm, for those who jump on this law’s bandwagon, ya know…..there could be some working in healthcare who decide it’s time for old, white people in the hospital to go see Jesus….
Think! Please think!
Boomer
|
paging @golfingeagles
paging @golfingeagles
needed in the legal library STAT!
Slow down peeps!
CMS reimbursements for all kinds of healthcare activities is a large part of the operating revenue of most hospitals. Part of that reimbursement is the participation in all the CMS requirements and programs
Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) | CMS
EMTALA is one of them. A hospital with an emergency room and receiving medicare reimbursements, would be in violation and would risk jeopardizing their reimbursements and payments if they voluntarily turned away people for these arbitrary reasons. Most hospitals would not want to do that.
So, the effects of the little dictator are not currently clear in regards to different healthcare scenarios. Many hospital systems also have policies in place for health care workers to not work in areas which they have religious objections, such as an abortion clinic. However, a healthcare worker would not abstain from rending care in the case of the mother bleeding out afterwards. . .
So these statutes have just been past, and there will be time needed to determine if the governor is over reaching in his state's rights legislation.
advice from coachk who works with CMS, reimbursements, the state of MA and the electronic medical records system which is the basis for reporting and compliance.
and written by sportsguy