The following scenario is a futuristic scenario for debate purposes, the future is uncertain and this scenario may or may not play out in the future:
So, lets think about the execution implications of how the future might play out:
*Non emergency doctors have an option. .
OK, seems reasonable . .
*The assumption behind the bill is that there will always be someone willing to perform the desired service.
OK, maybe BUT if there is now only a LIMITED number of doctors performing the services, the price might rise, giving access ONLY to more affluent folks or the line could get very long for the service. .
OK, maybe, and then the only services available to you are ethnic services?
Since many objections are faith or religious based, will the questionable services become ethnic/religious only services? Will the ethnic services be of the same quality as the non discriminatory services? I have a florida colleague from south america, who doesn't trust any south florida hispanic/south american doctors, for their affinity to fraud.
I am not advocating any outcome, but thinking about future outcomes, could these outcomes or similar outcomes be the result? and is this the outcome you would like to see for grandchildren, and your great grandchildren?
|