Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
The ignorance of these statements requires no further response.
|
Hmm, your post seems irrelevant if my statement requires no response.
Let me make it simple so that anyone can understand. The idea that has been bandied about is that children should or should not be taught or exposed to abnormal lifestyles by the media or commercial business. Those that oppose the idea of exposing children to the abnormal, deviant lifestyle are suggesting that children are too young to made to decide for themselves whether the lifestyle should be part of their life. Those that are pro-exposure to children are suggesting that they be taught the lifestyle and then let them decide because today's grown up are not reliable parents. Does that put it simple and in a nutshell?
So, my question is:
Suppose we say "OK, let's teach the kids that these other lifestyles are acceptable and that they should decide for themselves if one of those deviant lifestyles is for them or not." So, how do you explain them to the children? When they ask their parents or the so-called teachers what or how these lifestyle are, are they explained the abnormal nature of sodomy? Of course, I have been told many times that trans-dressers are not gay. Really? Does anyone really believe that? So, explaining sodomy to children is OK or not? I believe it should be taboo to little children. Like I have said many times in the past, what you do in private is your business. What you attempt to teach my children better be fine with me or we have a problem. So, NO this garbage does not need to be commercialized for all to see.
"SO, what are you going to teach your child to be when he/she/it grows up? Male, female or non-binary?"