Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy
Interesting to check your personal response:
A) Get the job finished before the labor pool shrinks and costs more
B) follow the rules first, and the system will work for everybody equally . .
Now if your response is an A response, think about why:
most likely its low cost and an acceptable small wait period due to abundant cheap labor
you personally feel good about getting good value for your dollar and in a reasonable time
Now if your response is a B response, think about why:
most likely its about the fairness, equality, country, control
Now thinks about why the two are in conflict in your mind:
When I apply for a management job, I have to provide legal identification and proof of eligibility to work
After I fill out the form, I feel its a pain in the ass, but some comfort that there are eligibility gates for people coming for your income.
But when I am paying out for the job, I prefer good value, cheap labor who performs well.
I don't care about the labor details of the people, as long as its cheap and well done.
Your typical human response is B is good for the country and the citizens, but A is good for me. .
The national economic strategy is best value for your hard earned money. . but does how enter your decision?
This is how most people think/feel. . but if you have to pick one, which do you pick?
everyone follows the rules, no special treatment or loopholes, or good value for your hard earned money, the cheaper the better no matter how its achieved?
if you take the time to really analyze the source of your thoughts and feelings,
they might well be in conflict as described above. . . which should make BOTH sides of your brain hurt
just food for thought about your social contract when buying services.
|
It's a stupid rule, considering how difficult staffing for labor jobs has been. Look at who is competing for the jobs. Not many out-of-work Floridians (that the Gov states he is protecting). Some of the contractors in our village have been waiting for workers so they can finish 2 year old projects. I'd like to see the analysis and discussion of that legislation. Doesn't seem well thought out.
Surely there is a better way to get people back to work. Also, how will the newly unemployed workers affected by this law pay their bills? Chew on that a bit.