Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueblaze
Maybe you could try disproving the science posted on the first page of this thread instead of simply labeling anyone who acknowledges it (such as my son-in law, the scientist), a "denier".
It's not our "party" who so readily reverts to arguing with nasty names instead of facts. And yet somehow, it's never your "party" whose opinions are labeled "misinformation" and banned from speaking, even though those opinions so often turn out to be facts in hindsight. Anybody remember when Al Gore said that Florida would be underwater by 2016 because the polar icecaps would have melted?
Since we're supposedly banned from discussing politics (or at least some of us are), why not, in the interest of fairness, allow your neighbors their own opinions when it comes to unproven scientific theories and try to refute those opinions, instead of simply calling them names? Its only fair, since, if we tried that trick, we'd be kicked off the site.
|
The "science" put out by Sounding has been disproven time and again on Talk of the Villages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1MZ8U8C9c8
"Neil deGrasse Tyson scolds cherry picking climate science".
A lot of Soundings graphs are well known among Climate Deniers and have a lot of evidence against them being leveled against them by people actually looking for the facts rather than skewing them.