Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueblaze
Maybe you could try disproving the science posted on the first page of this thread instead of simply labeling anyone who acknowledges it (such as my son-in law, the scientist), a "denier".
It's not our "party" who so readily reverts to arguing with nasty names instead of facts. And yet somehow, it's never your "party" whose opinions are labeled "misinformation" and banned from speaking, even though those opinions so often turn out to be facts in hindsight. Anybody remember when Al Gore said that Florida would be underwater by 2016 because the polar icecaps would have melted?
Since we're supposedly banned from discussing politics (or at least some of us are), why not, in the interest of fairness, allow your neighbors their own opinions when it comes to unproven scientific theories and try to refute those opinions, instead of simply calling them names? Its only fair, since, if we tried that trick, we'd be kicked off the site.
|
The science has been done and ( as science should do) is continuing to go on, by minds and experts greater than any on TOTV, I believe. The nation's of the world formally believe what has been demonstrated, and I believe it.
But, there are always those who challenge the mainstream. To challenge is good, if one uses proper methods. But, like flat earth, they start with a flawed hypothesis and create what ever they need to fit their crazy model. That isn't science, it is science fiction, and not even good science fiction.
In the end the truth, the whole truth, to this and many other questions will become clear. Humanity may wish their forefathers had been better stewards of lifeboat Earth.