Quote:
Originally Posted by MrChip72
Your argument against climate change is that a guy that got fired from teaching at a third rate college for saying things that you believe to be true? So you're saying the several thousands of other scientists around the world that haven't been fired are just making crap up for fun and that one guy who is now unemployable is correct in his findings?
|
No, my argument is not against "climate change", the climate has been changing for millions of years. My argument is against
anthropomorphic climate change, and particularly that the powers that be have somehow managed to convince the ignorant and weak minded public that this is a "fact" and that we should spend a hundred TRILLION dollars to "combat" it, which you can be sure will only benefit
them'.
One way to accomplish this is by bribing and threatening the experts that could educate the public as to the truth by creating the culture that Blue's son, a climate scientist experienced----loss of tenure for not signing on to the party line, as well as losing government grants and publications. I realize that the truly indoctrinated into this manmade climate myth will disagree, but consider this: Try to apply for a government grant for your research that intends to prove that climate change has nothing to do with fossil fuels----rotsa ruck---be honest, we all know the outcome of
that. And since these are the professors that teach our young people, they get to indoctrinate a new generation.
Next, since the media are already in bed with their misguided philosophy, use them to mislead the public. Then, the corporations, reading the mood of their customers, start in with "electric vehicles", "reduced carbon footprints", "alternative fuels" and "renewable energy". And all along, those in power promoting this garbage are laughing all the way to the bank.
Now, if you want to talk science, here it is: We are currently in an ice age that began about 4.5 million years ago. During this time there have been over a dozen periods of glaciation and interglacial thaws in cycles of 60-100,000 years (and humans/hominids have survived all of them). Twenty thousand years ago, New York was under 2 miles of ice, since then we have had "global warming" and the city is ice free----so what kind of SUV did Fred Flintstone drive and did Bedrock have a coal burning power plant???? Obviously, at least to anyone with a functioning cerebral cortex, this warming has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMAN ACTIVITY.
Now, to throw the true believers a bone: Is it possible that human activity since the industrial revolution is altering the climate trajectory of the last 4 million years??? Sure, it's possible, but we don't have enough data to draw any conclusions. A century of
weather records on one side and a chart showing 7 years of cooling on the other prove nothing about cycles that last 100,000 years.
Nobody knows. But to spend $ 100 TRILLION????? We don't have the technology to fight the driving forces of the sun, Earth's orbit, and Earth's axis variations. All we can do for $100 trillion is change from burning fossil fuel in our cars to EV's that use electricity from burning fossil fuels at power plants. That and line the pockets of the powers that are benefiting from this myth and perhaps enrich warlords in the countries that supply 95% of the world's lithium.