Quote:
Originally Posted by Pballer
For those of you that have a problem with the 2nd amendment, maybe you should move to Japan, Australia, England or Western Europe where guns are restricted and gun violence is rare. Otherwise deal with it. When everyone has unrestricted access to guns, everyone is safer. We need good guys with guns to protect us from the bad guys with guns.
|
You mean like the sheriff's deputy at Parkland, that good guy with the gun, who protected the kids from the bad guy with the gun?
Or any of the people who have guns who were good people at the mass shooting in Baltimore recently? Those 30 people who were shot, might have a thought about the good guy with the gun protecting them from the bad guy with a gun.
That is SUCH a tired cliche, it isn't true, it makes no sense, and it's dangerous thinking. Good guys with guns can be ineffective. They can be there - and not use their guns. They can be there and wait until they've already failed to protect some people, and then use their guns. They can use their guns and miss. They can THINK they're shooting a bad guy with a gun, but actually they're shooting someone who didn't have any gun at all.
Good guys are not infallible. And in some cases - they can cause more harm than they can prevent.
When the problem is "people with guns," then giving more guns to more people is not the answer.