Listeneing to a debate on this issue the other day, a
congress person said beginning with "however, there is nothing in the bill that states specifically they can't apply. And there is nothing in the bill that would preclude a decision to allow a given applicant. To the point they could even qualify for subsidy to help pay for the insurance if they could not afford it.
As we continue to learn, it is not just what the bill may state, but equally as important is what it does not state, hence LOOPHOLES, included and I would guess, intentionally. Lawyers go to school to wordsmith for a reason.
My opinion.
btk
|