Quote:
Originally Posted by rsibole
Two words - data points.
Fact, shallow water is warmer than deep water. Temperature previously taken in ten foot of water but now taken in six inches of water to prove someone’s point of view is certainly possible to have been done, especially in light of the other data point manipulations we seen in polls, surveys and reporting.
Conclusions drawn from manipulated data points are false, like the need to eliminate gas cooking stoves and raise taxes to cool the ocean is necessary.
Proven facts, like ocean currents and underwater volcanic activity, do cause localized changes (data points). However, change is constant and unavoidable. Changes are the result of self canceling activities over an entire spectrum. It’s often referred to as “nature” but in fact is natural law. And unlike man’s laws, natural laws cannot be broken or altered by man.
If it were not for change, natural laws, there would be no oceans, no gas stoves and no you or me.
|
Where did you get the information that the previous readings were taken in ten feet of water but recent readings were taken in six inches of water?
According to the NOAA information for the MNBF1 buoy the readings were taken at a depth of 4.9 feet.
Is there an underwater volcano two miles off the Florida Keys? I wanna go see that!
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|