Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Cross Pollination
View Single Post
 
Old 09-05-2009, 06:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talk Host View Post
The administrators are very pleased with the current tenor of the political forum. Those who found it too difficult to make two mouse clicks have apparently decided to go elsewhere.
The issue cannot cavalierly be dismissed by suggesting it is rooted in "two mouse clicks". That is either colossally disingenuous or a calculated insult to those who harbor sincere opinions that conflict with your own. It is hard to believe anyone is critical of the simple process you implemented to make transition to subscription transparent. I believe you know that....which is why it makes your response even more puzzling. You own the ballpark and can do with it what you wish. That is clearly understood. The New York Times owns the paper but that doesn't mean I have to agree with their editorial agenda....not that I believe you have an agenda as sinister as the New York Times.

I am sure you are pleased with the diluted "tenor" of the forum. Tenor being the active word, your word, not mine. More than one poster has acknowledged the distilled "tenor" you yourself acknowledge by your choice of that word. Why not say the 'Political forum has more posts and views than ever before'? It has exceeded our expectations with snappy dialogue and stimulating debate.' How about taking a shot at answering the questions in my original post with empirical objectivity (numbers) instead of subjective "wisecracking". Somehow I expected more from the administration. Controversy and debate can coexist with civility.

I did not start this thread to debate your decision. In fact, if you read it carefully, I gave attribution on several occasions to your efforts and thoughtful initiatives to support the new forum. I expressed empathy with and agreement for your exclusive right and decision to create a subscription venue for the political forum. The other side of that coin is that you created a talk forum presumably for the exchange of ideas, open debate and discussion.

I have never walked away from a righteous hip shot without returning a calculated volley. I suspect you haven't either. Of course I mean this in the literary context not in the behind the OK Corral setting. I hope this constructive effort is taken for its intent and does not meet with an editorial axe or worse. If you make an executive decision to relegate this thread, post and/or the poster to the recycle bin....I will understand....but respectfully disagree with the action.

It just got awful dark and quiet...."Hello out there?" "Am I in the recycle bin?"