View Single Post
 
Old 08-01-2023, 07:38 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,821
Thanks: 2,091
Thanked 7,261 Times in 2,831 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
I've read the constitution of the United States of America. I don't remember the part where a person acting in a suspicious manner is immune from being stopped by law enforcement. What country's constitution are you referring to?????
You are reading it wrong. The Constitution doesn't grant rights to the individual, the Constitution limits the rights of the Government. Don't look for "suspicious manner" as something a person can do and still keep his rights, look at it as something the Government can use to take away his rights.

You won't find "suspicious manner" anywhere in the Constitution of the United States - it is not grounds for the Govt to take away anyone's rights.

In particular, you should be looking at the 4th Amendment. That amendment mentions probable cause, not suspicious manner. And while it doesn't characterize "unreasonable," I can't believe a policy with an 88% error rate could ever be acceptable.

As for the rest, I have no desire to rehash the last 106 posts. Post #93 seems to sum things up pretty well.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough

Last edited by Bill14564; 08-01-2023 at 07:50 PM.