Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid
allows some to vent on him and distort the intention of the thread. I guess fortunately or not, I did not hear it from Glenn Beck, but did google as well as other research. There is ONLY one litany after another about the man's hatred for whites and hatred for America....a bonifide, multiple source confirmation being a radicle activists in his beliefs.
The profile of way too many of the incumbents in political office today is bad enough and they need to be replaced. In their defense, none could be bad enough to match Jones' dis-qualifications. The man would not, could not pass any investigative process. There is no way he would be elected to anything by we the people.
And I am glad to see we the people begin to speak up.
The party line on Jones is typical of most executive situations where folks are actually going to be fired, but to make it palatable for their futures they are given the opportunity to resign. Then the smoothing external announcement that they will still be around.....which they will not. Except for perhaps some investigation into him further.
Unfortunately Obama will slip away with almost no criticism or investigation as to why he would appoint some one such as Van Jones, KNOWING his back ground. Ooops, I stand corrected. He was appointed because Obama did know his background.
At some point the Obamas pasts in conjunction with example after example of the types he has surrounded himself in the past, match the types he is currently surrounding himself with. This accumulation of character (or not) will weigh heavily against him in his remaining years as POTUS and possibly assure a one term presidency.
With millions to choose from, why would anybody choose the likes of Van Jones for anything. This should not be a partisan issue at all. Dregs are dregs regardless ones affiliation!!!
btk
|
HIS ENTIRE LIFE...ALL of it...he has associated with radicals, followed radical thinking. It is only since his campaign for the WH that he had anyone on his staff or around him who MIGHT be considered non radical.
Before CHELS jumps in and proclaims how wonderful it is to be radical and that there is nothing wrong with it OR that everyone who walks now will have this kind of stuff in their background...I respectfully submit that the radicals our President is enamored with were unamiously anti america and most flirted with or were blatant communists !