Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
The article argues that there is a record high coverage - I did not dispute that.
I wrote that quality matters too - the article did not address that.
The last page of the article, the list of "climate change is bogus" articles, was quite enlightening. Not exactly an unbiased scientific organization.
Stick with weather - your climatologist chops are lacking and your marine biologist "expertise" seems to be worse.
|
Attacking the person is a favorite tool of climate alarmists, which is not how science works. Science is based on data - not rhetoric. Here's the data. Notice there is no coral growing in the flaming hot polar oceans. They love warm water and CO2.