Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
Interesting. I think I heard:
1. Climate change is real but it's a small price to pay for the convenience of burning fossil fuels.
2. Climate change is real but we don't know the precise magnitude of how bad it will be and we like the convenience of burning fossil fuels.
3. If we use our definitions to restate what a paper claims to show then we can demonstrate that the paper doesn't show that. Oh, and we like the convenience of burning fossil fuels.
To be fair, the paper says: Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. People can debate whether "humans are causing global warming" means all warming is caused by humans or whether it means the significant increase in warming is caused by humans. The video argues against the former but so would I. On the other hand, while the irrefutable proof is missing, I believe the latter.
|
Actually according to the Video, an analysis showed that less that 2% of the papers surveyed specifically said that human activity was the main cause of Climate change, the alleged scientific researcher admitted that he included papers where he felt that the change was anthropogenic is "implied", but not stated specifically. Pretty representative of what passes for research today, total drivel.