Quote:
Originally Posted by defrey12
Sorry, but I think this is the WRONG discussion. What y’all are proposing is nothing short of violating constitutional property rights. Yes, there may be an issue. But wholesale limits on what a person can or cannot do with their property via government intrusion is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! PERIOD! If I (or you) want to rent our property NO ONE can tell us not to. Should there be SENSIBLE rules? Sure. But to put outright prohibitions on such activities is AGAINST THE LAW! Then the discussion turned to financing enforcement of these nonsensical edicts…the county can’t even figure out how to pay for fire protection, so do you think they’ll actually entertain such a notion?
|
Of course they can tell you what you can do on your property. You are not in a cave or in the middle of the dessert. What you do affects your neighbors and you do not have a right to compromise their well-being. For example, you can’t burn leaves etc in a barrel on your lawn in most cities. Why do you think one person’s right supersedes a whole group of others? If you don’t like to comply, go find your cave.
As far as TV Lifestyle promotion goes, it is never billed as a vacation etc. party time or etc. It is a sample of living with the intent that if you like it then you buy a home in TV. It is part of the sales advertising. The STR renters almost never intend to buy a home here. They just come for the facilities, usually not giving much care about their negative impact on the people around them.