Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725
|
Expressing their disapproval of the speaker's viewpoint is perfect; demanding that the speaker be canceled or shouting the speaker down is not.
Nice contrast in the approaches reported in those two articles (understanding that much may not have been reported). The Princeton article focuses on how the talk was allowed to occur unimpeded while the Pitt article focuses on attempts to cancel the speaker. I personally prefer the Princeton approach.
I found this statement in the Princeton article to be humorous: On email listservs across Princeton’s campus, similar debates raged on. One email thread involving undergraduates grew over 25 messages long. 25 messages long? 25 messages on ToTV is a thread just getting started!
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|