Hijacked
Quote:
Originally Posted by margaretmattson
I believe you are now just picking and choosing "special wording.". A poster in the above stated we live in a democracy with the constitution providing us with laws and rights each citizen lives by. The same as what you are saying. He then went on in detail to explain how it works. The poster then got backlashed. Maybe, they will believe it from you.
|
Wow, this thread has gone on a tangent of its own. Meandering to parts of unexpected consequence…lol
Now we are debating the US Constitution often attenuated with the Bill of Rights? Why not the Articles of Confederation too. Or let’s go back to the English Bill of Rights. Heck why not the essays of the Magna Carta? My the slope is slippery in argument. I’m not sure the number of differing argument diagrams can be calculated in a philosophy class?
My interpretation:
It’s great to hear freedom of speech while not infringing on another’s point of view. To know so much something of law and ignore the 5th, places some in a group I prefer to never be a part of.
__________________
Everywhere
.. though we cannot, while we feel deeply, reason shrewdly, yet I doubt if, except when we feel deeply, we can ever comprehend fully."—Ruskin
Borta bra men hemma bäst
Ћє βÌŦÐÍÐ₤Ξ®
|