Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbird45
In my first post I stated my main concern, even over climate change was pollution. Now ICE does add pollutant into the air and even with catalytic converters they still pump out fume. I'm sure if you stayed in a lock garage with the motor running you would agree. Now at the moment EVs are not totally pollutant free but they are better than ICEs and companies are investing lots of money into it. Now my point is this and I'm not going to bring up 99 percent of the scientist. If only 20% said that climate change was brought on by man, I still would take their side.
The deciding factor for me is money or life and to me preserving life is more important.
|
1. I agree with you about the motor running in a locked garage. I also wouldn't clean my bathroom with bleach without some ventilation. Do we need to get rid of bleach?
2. If 20% said climate change was brought on by man but 80% said otherwise, you would still take the side of the 20%? Would the 20% need any proof, or just have to say it?
3. Please tell me that 100% of the money you have in excess of your basic needs you donate to combat cancer and other diseases, world hunger, abortion, and violent crime, that you don't fly, and that you don't own an ICE car or gas golf cart. Otherwise, your preserving life over money is merely virtue signalling.