Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
You are joking, right?
I mean you have to be kidding. You don't think those 2 posters are defending STR aggressively???? Get real.
|
I am not joking. I am not kidding.
If I am one of the 2, then I know that you are 100% wrong and that you have not bothered to read my posts with the intent to understand what I was saying.
If one of the 2 is Bill14xx, then I know that you are 100% wrong because I actually took the time to read his posts, not make up positions for him.
If one of the 2 is Brian..., then I don't know what his real feelings or motivations are because he hasn't expressed them, but I do know that you are 100% wrong on what his posts have actually stated and not what you and others keeping making up and attributing to posters.
So who is left?
I have asked, who do you think supports STRs. You (I think) responded that that violates the rules because we are not to address posters directly. I think that is an absolute copout. Well over half of the post direct their point directly to someone or about someone. Merely stating that I think these 2 posters have agressively defended STRs is not a violation, or not even close to other posts as far as violation. The problem with doing that though is that you know their is ZERO basis for the position, IF YOU READ WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY WRITING.
I think this is the fourth time or fifth time I will ask.
PLEASE PROVIDE THE POST NUMBER OF THE POST IN THIS THREAD OR THE OTHER WHERE SOMEONE SAID THEY WERE IN SUPPORT OF STRS OR DEFENDING THEM.
There are over 500 posts between the 2 threads and has been correctly stated, the vast majority of people posting are against STRs. Sure one of you can find one post that actually defends STRs or supports STRs.