Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybersprings
Nope. Wasn't still doing it. I admitted I didn't look up your post, and stated what I thought you had said. You are correct in that I got it wrong.
Apologies again for getting it wrong.
I will search through your posts though and see if I can find where you admit that you attributed to someone a position or statement they didn't make. I might be looking for a long LONG time. Because when you are called on it, you say people are parsing words or they may not have said it but it is obvious that's what they meant.
I get it. Many are tired of reading my posts and don't like me (virtually). But I hope that there are good people out there who can see the differences in peoples' post. But, as I said in another post elsewhere, unmet expectations do not lead to positive emotions (so you need to manage your expectations and hopes).
|
Psychic as well????
Look, I get it, and nobody's perfect. The problem is that you kind of set yourself up as the self appointed guardian of ensuring factual posts. That's a tough role to fulfill and when you screw up everyone is going to point it out, especially on TOTV--America's friendliest social medium
Best not to be so literal and give a little latitude.
Look, I do the same thing when somebody posts some medical nonsense---and I justify it by knowing I'm preventing the dissemination of erroneous information. At least I get the benefit of a good laugh when someone wants to argue the point because they "googled it"