At least the “Invester” groups are addressed
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
I would proffer that the rules adopted by Ft. Pierce are intended to address "abuses", but in fact, simply raise the cost to run a STR (& increase revenue for the city) and do little or nothing to limit STR's.
It's sort of like adopting a new Speed Limit. Great theory, it might help a little, but folks aren't really "prohibited" from speeding, they simply must face the consequences if caught.
Don't get me wrong, they did a decent job with what they had to work with, but they were really stymied by FL state law.
https://stlucievillagefl.gov/wp-cont...rce-21-019.pdf |
Yes, but invester groups (which don’t even belong here) would be forced to move on. Not many would pay for “home watchers” to host while their places are rented out.
__________________
Everywhere
.. though we cannot, while we feel deeply, reason shrewdly, yet I doubt if, except when we feel deeply, we can ever comprehend fully."—Ruskin
Borta bra men hemma bäst
Ћє βÌŦÐÍÐ₤Ξ®
|