Quote:
Originally Posted by The Chipster
Hilarious. I'm going to save this whole discussion for my great grandchildren to read someday - say 50 years from now when they have cars we cannot even imagine. They will howl with laughter at all the EV naysayers back in 2023 who can't focus on the big picture, which is: We are now WAY early in EV technology. Those of us that have and love EVs are early adopters, well aware of the current issue with outside charging stations, prices, etc. But we also know that major changes are happening NOW in the EV industry, such as solid state batteries that will have 2X or 3X the range in a few years. And the car companies know that they need to invest in the EV game or go extinct, even if the next few years are going to be financially tough for them. Because the current technology of internal combustion engines is on its way out, declining in market share vs. EVs, as we speak.
|
Yes, your post IS hilarious!
Funny how the "early adopters" like to brag how "forward thinking" they are, but they fail to take into account that they are the few who are able to charge their EVs at home, in the comfort of their garage... They are able to pay $thousands more for an EV when most Americans are struggling to purchase ANY new car. Elitism at it's finest!
No one is saying that EVs won't be the vehicles of the future. They are saying that RIGHT NOW, we are not ready for what the government is not only suggesting, but forcing people to to... And they are saying that they won't be the ONLY vehicles of the future...
No problem with "investing in the game". But do it wisely. Make sure you have the infrastructure in place to accommodate all of the EVs they want us to but.
So far, I don't see that happening. Ignoring the problems that were posted (such as where apt and condo dwellers are supposed to charge their EVs, and the lack of available electricity to charge the increased number of EVs) is foolish. Some might even call it "hysterical...