Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
I am sure you apply the same decision making to your view of religion. It is a very rare person who spouts their faith actually lives the tenets of that faith in each action they take. It is a very rare doctor who takes their own advice, it is a very rare cop who follows the law, it is a very rare politician who has ethics...
So your "believe in Global Warming" argument rejection must mean you reject medicine, religion, law enforcement.... or your argument is bogus.
Not even the most ardent rejectionist are now arguing there is no global warming event like they did a few years ago. Now the goalposts have moved and they accept that the planet is rapidly warming as there is now irrefutable evidence of that fact.
Instead it is now that humans play no role in that event or that it doesn't matter because it sure will be nice when it is warmer. You can see both of these arguments presented in this very thread. One person telling us that climate always changes, but ignoring that it does not change as rapidly as it is now without some major shift in the factors that control climate none of which have occurred other than humans burning fossil fuels and changing the amount of greenhouses gases.
Another poster telling us how wonderful hot earth will be because we will have such a nice diverse number of species.
Follow the money others pontificate... Yes, I am sure that those university adjuncts are rolling in cash now, way more that the profits of Exxon and Shell and BP an others, almost none of which is going to cleaning up or new investment or employee benefits. No those obscene profits are going into stock buy backs to increase the net worth of the CEOs and the 1% That is the money you need to be following. That is where the big bucks are.
I will await somebody posting how much those working on fixing the problem profited in 2022. And this is PROFIT not income.
|
There are 6 billion more people than there were a hundred years ago so yes humans are contributing to climate change. I just don’t believe the current proposed solutions have been well though out. Electric cars are built with toxic waste and require tens of thousands of gallons of water when they catch fire and the energy grid is no where near ready to handle them. How much energy is needed to produce new energy saving appliances and how do we deal with the old ones?We are simply trading one set of problems for another. All the while lining certain pockets with money.